C# TI-83+ linking library - Got a blacklink?
Moderator: MaxCoderz Staff
Well, I've gotta admit I'm not even 100% sure of what C# is much less what it can do, so this is pretty interesting. To answer the original questions, I've got the El Cheapoâ„¢ Brand homemade cables...in flavors serial and parallel. ...And I'd find it useful because none of the damned things work anymore.
My diet consists of nails, code-stealers, and HP fans.
Projects:
Robot War [TI-82, TI Flash App]
Sonic the Hedgehog [Multiplatform]
Projects:
Robot War [TI-82, TI Flash App]
Sonic the Hedgehog [Multiplatform]
- benryves
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Thu 16 Dec, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Croydon, England
- Contact:
The blacklink I mean is the serial cable (9-pin DB9 connector) which doesn't deal directly with the RS232 protocol. The grey link converts RS232 serial to the TI protocol, the blacklink has to do this in software.
Well, it looks like not many have this cable... but at the very least, I'll have a decent linking program for myself to use
I've discovered some odd things - it is possible to dump down groups/applications from the calculator and collect them all into a single .8x? file (the file spec allows for multiple variables in a single file). If you then open the file in, say, FastLink, you can send the data over - but it ends up doing odd things, like sticking apps and groups in RAM, and trying to ungroup/archive them does even odder things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_Sharp
It's a real pleasure to work with.
Well, it looks like not many have this cable... but at the very least, I'll have a decent linking program for myself to use
I've discovered some odd things - it is possible to dump down groups/applications from the calculator and collect them all into a single .8x? file (the file spec allows for multiple variables in a single file). If you then open the file in, say, FastLink, you can send the data over - but it ends up doing odd things, like sticking apps and groups in RAM, and trying to ungroup/archive them does even odder things.
That would be more like J#. Not C#. One advantage of C# over Java is that it compiles to machine code, and doesn't run on a VM (well, nearly - the code is compiled to MSIL which is then JIT compiled when you run it for the first time by the .NET framework).tr1p1ea wrote:C# is basically microsofts attempt to destroy java.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_Sharp
It's a real pleasure to work with.
-
- Calc King
- Posts: 2195
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar, 2005 4:06 am
- Location: sleeping
- Contact:
- MissingIntellect
- Regular Member
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue 21 Dec, 2004 2:46 pm
- Location: Santa Clarita, California
- Contact:
-
- Calc Wizard
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Sat 28 May, 2005 5:34 am
- Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
- Contact:
*looks around* Where the hell did that come from? Anyone and everyone can argue how brilliant they are: I was using C++ in fifth grade. Does that mean I'm a genius? Hardly: I started Java this school year and already I'm much better [than C++] at it. Furthermore, when learning z80 (8th grade) I read a tutorial written by a seventh grader. I know enough to see mistakes in his code now.when i was in 6th grade i taught myself html so i could make a web site
Java syntax I like better than C++, if only Java could compile nicely to .exe like C++ and was just as fast; plus had all the proper OOP power... *sighs*.
Any progress on this, Ben? I'd certainly be interested in it, even if I would have to learn C# in order too . I've always wanted a way to communicate PC -> Calc, but I don't know enough about the hardware to do so.
Hmm, that's interesting indeed Ben
I have a parallel homemade link cable. Shouldn't be too much trouble to add an option for it, since that also requires the program to implement the protocol.
Anyway, I don't think I'd use it any time soon, since I'm still *planning* to learn more C/C++ and haven't even touched C# yet
I have a parallel homemade link cable. Shouldn't be too much trouble to add an option for it, since that also requires the program to implement the protocol.
Anyway, I don't think I'd use it any time soon, since I'm still *planning* to learn more C/C++ and haven't even touched C# yet
http://clap.timendus.com/ - The Calculator Link Alternative Protocol
http://api.timendus.com/ - Make your life easier, leave the coding to the API
http://vera.timendus.com/ - The calc lover's OS
http://api.timendus.com/ - Make your life easier, leave the coding to the API
http://vera.timendus.com/ - The calc lover's OS
People seem to enjoy turning programming language topics into their personal resumé one way or another. I blame the devil.Rezek wrote:*looks around* Where the hell did that come from?
Anyway, if this linking program supported (better) link debugging, that would especially cool. I know this suggestion is probably too soon, but those vague one-liner error messages they have in other link progs just doesn't cut the mustard.
My diet consists of nails, code-stealers, and HP fans.
Projects:
Robot War [TI-82, TI Flash App]
Sonic the Hedgehog [Multiplatform]
Projects:
Robot War [TI-82, TI Flash App]
Sonic the Hedgehog [Multiplatform]
-
- Calc Wizard
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Sat 28 May, 2005 5:34 am
- Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
- Contact:
Now what I would like to see is one that doesn't attempt to see if a calc is on the other end when it sends over the link cable. *Shakes fist at TI-Connect*