[Featured][Dev] PindurTI (Best Thread 2005)

Timendus · Post by **Timendus** » Tue 31 Oct, 2006 7:55 pm

Wow... CoBB, you're amazing

What a waste of effort on my behalf

Post by **tr1p1ea** » Wed 01 Nov, 2006 1:13 am

My goodness, you had better be grateful! Hehe this is already the best emulator there is and with these kinds of features packed in, no-one would dare challenge!

DigiTan · Post by **DigiTan** » Wed 01 Nov, 2006 5:59 am

CoBB wrote:Added linking history graph.

(Stammering)

(Falls down anime-style)

KermMartian · Post by **KermMartian** » Wed 01 Nov, 2006 7:07 pm

CoBB: Any chance you'll fix the bug in the memory viewer where you have to press an arrow key after a Goto... address change to make the view change to the new address? Nothing major, just thought I'd mention it.

CoBB · Post by **CoBB** » Wed 01 Nov, 2006 10:35 pm

I would, but it never happens to me...

KermMartian · Post by **KermMartian** » Thu 02 Nov, 2006 3:23 am

O.o Seriously? Am I the first person to mention it then? It's happened on every Windows XP computer on which I've used PTI.

CoBB · Post by **CoBB** » Thu 02 Nov, 2006 7:18 am

I can only test it under XP and Wine, and both behave correctly for me.

Timendus · Post by **Timendus** » Thu 02 Nov, 2006 11:55 am

Hmm, I noticed the same thing in Wine recently, I think... can't confirm though.

King Harold · Post by **King Harold** » Sun 05 Nov, 2006 8:00 pm

didn't notice that.. But I DID notice that the buttons on the pindurTI debugger respond to right-clicking aswell, well the emulated TI responds to it, the buttons doesnt looks pushed. Nothing major.. just odd.

CoBB · Post by **CoBB** » Sun 05 Nov, 2006 10:13 pm

King Harold wrote:didn't notice that.. But I DID notice that the buttons on the pindurTI debugger respond to right-clicking aswell, well the emulated TI responds to it, the buttons doesnt looks pushed. Nothing major.. just odd.

What buttons are you talking about? You mean the slot selection? Note that the primary function of the left button is to press the on key, and I thought it’s reasonable to also switch to the calc in question. The right key can be used to switch without interfering with the calc in any way. That’s documented behaviour.

I uploaded a preliminary theme-supporting version, which means that the debugger window doesn’t look like total crap when you have a fancy theme enabled.

Since this feature is still buggy and untested, I didn’t use the normal link. Get it here:

http://users.hszk.bme.hu/~pg429/pindurt ... themed.exe

Note that it doesn’t work well with the ‘classic’ theme, and that’s something I’ll obviously fix. But if you can observe any other quirks, please let me know. And the changelog:

10:33 2006.11.05.
Handling more tokens.
Double clicking an item in the variable list jumps to its address in the memory view.
0:37 2006.11.05.
Improved variable names.
15:00 2006.11.04.
Screen size limit removed.
0:37 2006.11.04.
Switched to listview in the VAT component.
19:46 2006.11.02.
Preliminary theme support for XP.

Post by **tr1p1ea** » Mon 06 Nov, 2006 2:33 am

Im running out of ways to say how much PindurTI continues to impress. It makes calc development so much easier. The variables list is a nice touch.

CoBB · Post by **CoBB** » Mon 06 Nov, 2006 6:25 am

tr1p1ea wrote:Im running out of ways to say how much PindurTI continues to impress. It makes calc development so much easier. The variables list is a nice touch.

So it didn’t crash on you. Good to hear.

Spencer · Post by **Spencer** » Mon 06 Nov, 2006 9:26 am

This is specific to your newest release.

In the debugger, if you remove all of the panes from a ||| or ==, then delete one more, you consistently get a crash.

For all releases: if you remove all panes, there is no way to add any back. Changes are not saved after exiting pti.

We appreciate your work so far. Obviously nobody could've created such a fine foundation for an emulator as you have. However, in many ways our priorities are very different -- e.g. I'd prefer a stack trace instead of a link history, or memory i/o records instead of "hub" support. How about a source release?

Jim e · Post by **Jim e** » Mon 06 Nov, 2006 9:35 am

Yea that first crash happens with me to.

I have to agree though, although I know the linking emulation and history would be an absolute life saver when ever a I needed to do linking. I really don't see it as priority over things like stack trace and more break points.

Plus those four screen take up a lot of screen real estate.

Post by **kv83** » Mon 06 Nov, 2006 9:36 am

How about a source release?

Oh please not. That way you get multiple different releases from different people. This project is "to small" to be worked on by more than one person. I say; first finish it than release the source