xLIB v0.6b Testing
Moderator: tr1p1ea
Hey, when I was just messing around with my starting program I took out the turn run ind. off by accident, and when I reinserted it into the start it works every time even after a reset. Before it was before the disp graph command and then after I put it after it. So if anyone wants to see if dispgraph then the run ind. off command works let me know?
- dysfunction
- Calc Master
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed 22 Dec, 2004 3:07 am
- Location: Through the Aura
Well I used the Dispgraph not the xlib one, I don't think there should be a differnece, but give that command a try?dysfunction wrote:Strange, because I have the run indicator off function placed after dispgraph (well, real(6 actually, which is xlib's equivalent to dispgraph) and it still doesn't work after a reset.
Edit: Ok this sucks, my calc just crashed badly. I was using the run archived program command and I did:
Code: Select all
real(10,2,0 ;removes all xtemp0XX programs
real(10,0,11
prgmXTEMP011
- tr1p1ea
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Thu 16 Dec, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: I cant seem to get out of this cryogenic chamber!
- Contact:
kalan_vod, my apologies ... i had already tested that and found out that if Ans isnt a string that it will crash badly. I implemented the fix a week ago but i havent sent out the new version.
I dont see how it would be possible for it to ruin your calc as it doesnt write to anywhere but ram.
Secondly Merthsoft asked me to implement something that is giving me lots of trouble and has me totally confused because it doesnt seem possible. Once i fix that i will release.
Tell me when your calc is better .
I dont see how it would be possible for it to ruin your calc as it doesnt write to anywhere but ram.
Secondly Merthsoft asked me to implement something that is giving me lots of trouble and has me totally confused because it doesnt seem possible. Once i fix that i will release.
Tell me when your calc is better .
Yeah I hope so, but in the mean time I am bidding on this, I want a 83+ because I would rather program for a slower calc knowing that on a faster one the game would run even more.
- dysfunction
- Calc Master
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed 22 Dec, 2004 3:07 am
- Location: Through the Aura
I think you lost...kalan_vod wrote:Yeah I hope so, but in the mean time I am bidding on this, I want a 83+ because I would rather program for a slower calc knowing that on a faster one the game would run even more.
I am trying on a diff. one, but anywho I plugged in my batteries today and it is the same . If I don't win today on a bid, I am going to go buy one (Ti84+SE?).necro wrote:I think you lost...kalan_vod wrote:Yeah I hope so, but in the mean time I am bidding on this, I want a 83+ because I would rather program for a slower calc knowing that on a faster one the game would run even more.
- dysfunction
- Calc Master
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed 22 Dec, 2004 3:07 am
- Location: Through the Aura
- dysfunction
- Calc Master
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: Wed 22 Dec, 2004 3:07 am
- Location: Through the Aura
-
- Regular Member
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sat 18 Jun, 2005 9:15 pm
- Contact: