84silver.com's GraphiTI Phase II

A General Discussion forum for TI calculators

Moderator: MaxCoderz Staff

inportb
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 03 Oct, 2005 3:23 am

Post by inportb »

lloydkirk1989 wrote:I originaly planned on contacting TI-Cares today, but I can't because my votes keep on going way up. My credibility is ruined. I think I know who's doing it. People like CalcKing are probably facing a similar situation. By the way, the latest registered user, importb is actually Jiang Yio, the New York cheater. For fun I sent him an e-mail using a fake indentity as follows:
Hello Jiang Yio,

My name is Christiana Amaci. Sorry if my english is bad, I am from Italy. I found out about the design competition yesterday, so it was too late to make my own design. Being italian, im not sure I could have done the contest anyway. I thought that I help some other person win. I liked your design the best, so I searched your name and got this email address. I would like to help you win. Please let me know if there is anything I can do. A friend told me that a script can be made to vote quicker, but I dont know, whatever I can do to help.
And I got this reply:
Dear Christiana Amaci,

Thank you for supporting my cause! Much as I wish to win, I do not
wish to win through dishonorable methods. But it would greatly help if
you vote for me and ask your friends to vote for me. Again, thanks!

~jyio
LOL, 1 day and 5,000 votes later he has the ball to boast about his "honorable methods". I would certainly like to know what they are.
Oh? I'd hardly call _your_ methods honorable. Are you so afraid of confronting me directly that you must hide behind a contrived identity?

My "honorable methods" involve elisting the help of my school, which has over 3000 students. What the voters do is beyond my control (similarly for all of you), but I myself did not cheat in any way.

That said, I wonder why you're bashing me, since I'm not the highest scorer. California increased from 450+ to 10000+ overnight (no, I don't vote for people in my sleep) and is still going up. He's at 13663 at the moment. Second place is South Carolina, with 9961 votes. I wouldn't be so quick to point fingers if I were you. "Biggest cheater," eh? Why did I not make myself first place then? Or at least second, since California has such a ridiculous count?

I'm sorry guys, but I have no part in cheating for others, so this whole business is out of my control. Flame me if you want, but this'll get you nowhere. I suggest we find out who this Bhavik Gandecha character is, since his score's been increasing slowly but steadily since last night.
CalcKing
Regular Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat 18 Dec, 2004 3:24 am
Contact:

Post by CalcKing »

Wow, I'm impressed. This makes what, 4 finalists on this forum? :P

I think I'll call TI again today... they haven't replied to me. It's painfully obvious that people are cheat voting on my entry; I have had XX14 votes on it for quite a while (first 3014, then 3514, now 5014...). :(
Long live Z80 and #tiasm!


^^ Alas, I wrote that a long time ago. :(
Spengo
Calc Master
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sat 15 Jan, 2005 3:56 am
Location: ooga booga land
Contact:

Post by Spengo »

Well, most likely you are a perfectly fine person who has not done anything wrong, but the point is, some people ARE doing some cheating. Your entry just happened to be one of the examples of a design that was cheated on. Notice, that there are a few members of this forum in a similar predicament. Hopefully, no one is bashing anyone.
bananas... o.o
inportb
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 03 Oct, 2005 3:23 am

Post by inportb »

How do you think TI'll actually "review" the votes? If they're logging everyone's IP addresses, they might as well have used IP's to restrict voting in the first place... And, um, I think SouthCarolina's joined the cheating party, California style. It'd really suck if one of them wins, because they both look like eh. :/
CalcKing
Regular Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat 18 Dec, 2004 3:24 am
Contact:

Post by CalcKing »

Still no response from TI...

Here's something to ponder: One computer !necessarily= One visitor... So, for example: School computers. Say some school computer is used by one student to vote, then the next student votes on the same computer, then the next, etc.?

How can TI tell the difference between that, and a program? Obviously, if the votes are coming in very quickly, the odds of it being only human votes are slim... but still, there might be nothing they can do -- because of the STUPID voting system! :x

When I called TI today, they basically said that they couldn't help me at this point. It's somewhere in the pipeline, I guess, but I hope it didn't get stuck in the trap. :roll:
Long live Z80 and #tiasm!


^^ Alas, I wrote that a long time ago. :(
CalcKing
Regular Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat 18 Dec, 2004 3:24 am
Contact:

Post by CalcKing »

Double post, I realize that, but I had a double purpose in posting here and now:

1) I have calculated that the South Carolina entry has had approximately 12.061224 votes per minute over the past 49 minutes.

2) This is the 5000th post in the General TI Discussion forum!! 8)
Long live Z80 and #tiasm!


^^ Alas, I wrote that a long time ago. :(
inportb
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 03 Oct, 2005 3:23 am

Post by inportb »

Oh snap, California's got 32K.

No response to me either.
CalcKing
Regular Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat 18 Dec, 2004 3:24 am
Contact:

Post by CalcKing »

The contest browsing page seems to be down -- the main site loads, but nothing related to GraphiTI seems to work. I hope THIS means they're fixing it! :yes:
Long live Z80 and #tiasm!


^^ Alas, I wrote that a long time ago. :(
DarkAuron
Maxcoderz Staff
Posts: 1349
Joined: Sat 18 Dec, 2004 6:53 pm

Post by DarkAuron »

My email was replied:
Michael,

Sorry for just getting back to you, but I am just returning back to
work. I will forward your email to the appropriate persons.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Angel [mailto:Nacromancer@ev1.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 1:08 AM
To: Woodberry, Dwayne
Subject: Yet another problem with GraphiTI

The finals are in, and theres a very, very easy way to hack the voting
system. I really don't think whoever made the system is even trying to
make it secure. The flaw is that by simply deleting the cookies or
preventing them from being used, you can vote as much as you want. The
knowledgeable people can create scripts or programs to automate such an
action, and quite frankly I'm outraged. On the first day theres a few
people that had hundreds and hundreds of votes already, and at the
moment someone's votes are going up like crazy. Its gone from about 400
to 1200 votes in the last/ /few/ minutes/. I really don't understand why

people do this. Honestly I don't know what to say overall, but this is
just really messed up. The system shouldn't be based on votes, it should

be based on what TI, you guys, believe are the best design(s). That way
no cheating can occur in any instance.

-Michael
Since it was a personal email and not some automated techie person, I didn't get a silly commercial ;)
[Gridwars Score] - E: 1860037 M: 716641 H: 261194
inportb
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 03 Oct, 2005 3:23 am

Post by inportb »

CalcKing wrote:The contest browsing page seems to be down -- the main site loads, but nothing related to GraphiTI seems to work. I hope THIS means they're fixing it! :yes:
They hid the vote count. And I'm almost sure they didn't clear the votes, since that's exactly what happened in the first phase.
lloydkirk1989
Calc Wizard
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed 22 Dec, 2004 5:37 am
Location: West Palm Beach,FL
Contact:

Post by lloydkirk1989 »

Thats even worse! Now we can't even see who's cheating. In the first phase, they hid the ranking, not the vote count.
User avatar
Jim e
Calc King
Posts: 2457
Joined: Sun 26 Dec, 2004 5:27 am
Location: SXIOPO = Infinite lives for both players
Contact:

Post by Jim e »

lloydkirk1989 wrote:Thats even worse! Now we can't even see who's cheating. In the first phase, they hid the ranking, not the vote count.
I think that's the point...have you consider the possibility they got tired of the "they are cheaters" letters? I believe they pointed out that all votes would be checked to ensure that there isn't any cheating.

And besides, ALL OF YOU IN THE FINALS CHEATED!!!!! MY RABBIT ONLY GOT ONE VOTE AND IT WAS HAND DRAWN GOODNESS!!!!! I BLAME MICHAEL!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil:


j/k.....sorta :)
Image
lloydkirk1989
Calc Wizard
Posts: 680
Joined: Wed 22 Dec, 2004 5:37 am
Location: West Palm Beach,FL
Contact:

Post by lloydkirk1989 »

Please note: All votes will be reviewed closely and verified for validity before grand prize winner is named.
Please see official rules for more information.
Is this realy suppose to scare anyone? If you have a dynamic IP address, there's no way to tell whether the votes are comming from one computer or not. Secondly, there could be like 50 computers in a school library on the same network and therefore the same IP address. 1,000 votes in 20 minutes could simply be the result of a well done campaign. Seriously, there is no way for them to monitor this.
CalcKing
Regular Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat 18 Dec, 2004 3:24 am
Contact:

Post by CalcKing »

lloydkirk1989 wrote:
Please note: All votes will be reviewed closely and verified for validity before grand prize winner is named.
Please see official rules for more information.
Is this realy suppose to scare anyone? If you have a dynamic IP address, there's no way to tell whether the votes are comming from one computer or not. Secondly, there could be like 50 computers in a school library on the same network and therefore the same IP address. 1,000 votes in 20 minutes could simply be the result of a well done campaign. Seriously, there is no way for them to monitor this.
That's exactly what I was talking about:
CalcKing wrote:One computer !necessarily= One visitor... So, for example: School computers. Say some school computer is used by one student to vote, then the next student votes on the same computer, then the next, etc.?

How can TI tell the difference between that, and a program? Obviously, if the votes are coming in very quickly, the odds of it being only human votes are slim... but still, there might be nothing they can do -- because of the STUPID voting system! :x
It's beginning to seem like we should all just forget this whole thing and say that whatever happens happens. :kitty:
Long live Z80 and #tiasm!


^^ Alas, I wrote that a long time ago. :(
inportb
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 03 Oct, 2005 3:23 am

Post by inportb »

I'm just going to ignore it mostly and check it once in a while... And I just got this bs reply:
Dear Jiang,

Thank you for contacting Texas Instruments.

Please be assured that both Texas Instruments and the auditors who are monitoring the votes in the GraphitTi contest are aware of the underhanded methods being used to up the vote count for certain individual entries. Those votes will not be included in the final tally. All votes will be reviewed closely and verified for validity before the grand prize winner is named.

Sincerely,

Sarah Scott

Texas Instruments
-------------------------------------------------------
Email: ti-cares@ti.com
General Information: (800) 842-2737
Technical Support: (972) 917-8324
-------------------------------------------------------
Let me know how I'm doing. Fill out our customer survey at:

http://education.ti.com/us/supportsurvey

You can always visit the Texas Instruments Knowledgebase for around the clock solutions to your questions.

http://support.education.ti.com
And is it just me, or can you not vote anymore? I just checked this; if you try visiting the vote page, e.g. http://www.84silver.com/contest_vote_finals.php?id=1808, you end up at Yahoo! instead. Possibly, they'll collect the votes being cast now, and compare them with the votes cast before to guess which are invalid. Or mebbe they're working on the site (yay!). Idk, but I can't find a better explanation.
Last edited by inportb on Thu 06 Oct, 2005 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply