I reinstalled the Flash Debugger just to be sure but it still doesn't work..
And I'm using LateNite to attempt to build the app (wappsign looks correctly setup, with the proper paths and all)
edit: oh and, running XP of course
Search found 1514 matches
- Tue 07 Jul, 2009 1:40 pm
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: Can not sign apps - retrieving COM class factory failed.
- Replies: 10
- Views: 23957
- Tue 07 Jul, 2009 1:20 pm
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: Can not sign apps - retrieving COM class factory failed.
- Replies: 10
- Views: 23957
Can not sign apps - retrieving COM class factory failed.
Basically the title says it all..
What's going on?
What's going on?
- Fri 26 Jun, 2009 4:21 pm
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: [Java] Minesweeper Concepts
- Replies: 27
- Views: 53966
Re: [Java] Minesweeper Concepts
You can't have multidimension arrays in Java.
You can have jagged arrays of course, but they're really not the same.
You can have jagged arrays of course, but they're really not the same.
Re: upload
I have used it, but not for long.. I manged to recompile libvorbis with it though, with proper optimizations which the open source community doesn't seem to like - they insist on making everything compatible with ancient crap like 80186's, they should really learn that performance is more important ...
Re: upload
Just be careful, if you say or ask something stupid they will not forgive you..
Re: upload
Hm I don't mean to say that that is a bad idea, but do you know CodeProject?
Re: upload
Maybe that's just my luck, but it totally screwed up a cd that I tried to burn with it (I've yet to see someone burn an ISO with it, AFAIK you can not even try to), and exploring a network share? Not even close. It "disappeared" every few seconds for no reason at all (causing all transfers...
Re: upload
I'd probably use FireFTP though, not because I want to go into an FTP client war but because I don't really trust Explorer with anything other than exploring the harddisk (burn a cd with it or use a networked drive to know why)
- Sun 31 May, 2009 4:49 pm
- Forum: Programming Competition
- Topic: [News] Mini Programming Competition!
- Replies: 29
- Views: 111599
Re: Mini Programming Competition!
How about purposefully sucky grayscale so you get rain automatically?
- Wed 27 May, 2009 2:28 pm
- Forum: BBC BASIC
- Topic: [News] BBC BASIC Beta Testing - 2009/03/06 r720
- Replies: 158
- Views: 277861
Re: [News] BBC BASIC Beta Testing - 2009/03/06 r720
I think I'd hook into the "prgm" executing hook, well, that is, use the parser hook and then check whether the token was a "prgm"
- Mon 25 May, 2009 12:03 pm
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: Why asm sucks today.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 26365
Re: Why asm sucks today.
Yea I guess I'm a little too used to visual studio.. conditional breakpoints ftwkv83 wrote:Spoiled brat.
- Sat 23 May, 2009 9:22 pm
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: Why asm sucks today.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 26365
Re: Why asm sucks today.
Yea I've tried, but accurately emulating the hardware was hard enough to give up..
The core itself is not that hard though
The core itself is not that hard though
- Sat 23 May, 2009 8:33 pm
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: Why asm sucks today.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 26365
Re: Why asm sucks today.
No, would that work better?
I'm using brass (the old one, 1.something) and PTI
I'm using brass (the old one, 1.something) and PTI
- Sat 23 May, 2009 10:42 am
- Forum: Programming Help
- Topic: Why asm sucks today.
- Replies: 11
- Views: 26365
Why asm sucks today.
And yesterday, that's when it started. Anyway, I was debugging this stupid piece of code that would go berserk and fly into the C000 range at (seemingly) random. It was not ordinary code that flows in a relatively straight line, but the kind of code that jumps all over and pushes calculated addresse...
- Fri 22 May, 2009 10:45 am
- Forum: Staff Side Projects & Featured Projects
- Topic: [Staff] [Ideas] Primitive Multithreading
- Replies: 31
- Views: 57662
Re: [Staff] [Ideas] Primitive Multithreading
Well here's proof of that: di CS ei And that's it. But it has a nasty downside compared to many other ways of implementing critical sections, you would disable all threads - also threads that have nothing to do with it and aren't even trying to enter a critical section at all (or a different section)