ticalc.org goes ads
Moderator: MaxCoderz Staff
- Arcane WIzard
- Calc Guru
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Mon 21 Feb, 2005 7:05 pm
Why 50 cents? A couple of $$$ would work much better. : Pkv83 wrote:I think so too. It would generate a lot of money for ticalc.org if they only let you upload screenshots (for example) if you have a "gold" account (which costs about $0.50 a year or something)
Would increase money and decrease bandwith
- kv83
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Wed 15 Dec, 2004 7:26 pm
- Location: The Hague, Netherlands
- Contact:
I don't know. I guess everything higher than $2 wouldn't work that well and propably wouldn't feel like it's "worth" the couple of screenshots.Arcane WIzard wrote:Why 50 cents? A couple of $$$ would work much better. : Pkv83 wrote:I think so too. It would generate a lot of money for ticalc.org if they only let you upload screenshots (for example) if you have a "gold" account (which costs about $0.50 a year or something)
Would increase money and decrease bandwith
- Arcane WIzard
- Calc Guru
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Mon 21 Feb, 2005 7:05 pm
Oh I thought you where referring to an already existing premium account service with more functionality and that you where proposing it would cost 50 cents.kv83 wrote:I don't know. I guess everything higher than $2 wouldn't work that well and propably wouldn't feel like it's "worth" the couple of screenshots.Arcane WIzard wrote:Why 50 cents? A couple of $$$ would work much better. : Pkv83 wrote:I think so too. It would generate a lot of money for ticalc.org if they only let you upload screenshots (for example) if you have a "gold" account (which costs about $0.50 a year or something)
Would increase money and decrease bandwith