One of the abortion supporters here was saying that if a woman became pregnant and wasn't able to kill her child, she could very well commit suicide. I also recall someone saying that the parents of the mother might wind up going insane. If sex causes people to kill themselves, how is that better than not having sex? It has been a documented fact that a lot of girls kill themselves shortly after having sex for the first time(outside of marriage).necro wrote:1st. Do you or do you not concede that our boddies attempt to force us to sexuality? We are supposed to have sex, and evidence suggest your body will suffer damage from abstenience (google it if you disbelieve...but it will be hard to find the results amoungst the bias).
Look at Nikola Tesla. He was one of the smartest scientific minds, and he never had sex or got married. He invented many advanced things, and almost started putting up power plants that would transmit power wirelessly(no more power lines. Unfortunately, not enough money either). He lived a long and productive life, filing 700 patents! Our entire world would be very different today if it was not for him. He even invented the Radio, and Radar. Imagine a world without that! Who are you to say that your body will suffer damage if you don't have sex? He lived longer than the average lifespan, and did much more than you could ever hope to accomplish. His work was so advanced, it was confiscated by the government at his death so no enemy could use it against us.
Why is the occurance of STD's so high? Marriage is neccesary to raise children well, and extramarital sex can ruin a marriage. A policy of abstinance until marriage would reduce STD's dramatically(they would virtually dissapear after only a few generations) and reduce the need to kill unborn children.2nd. Mariage is not based on sex, and vice versa. They can happen within each other, but I doubt highly that more than 20 percent of them have NO extramaritial sex. Why? Because sex is attractive while mariage is not exactly so. Why is divorce rate so high?
So, they should be able to kill the child for their own convienience? I don't think even Timendus agrees with that. Killing because you don't feel like doing something is just wrong.3rd. If a couple are fediel with each other, even if they don't plan to stay together permenantly, STDs should be a non-issue. If a couple use contraceptives, they should not have kids. So, they ARE being responsible...and if life decided to be a bitch then they should still be punished? Not IMO.4th. Not all married couples want kids! WOW! So, even if they get hitched, they may want the seed unstiched. You loose.
Whenever a woman has sex, she is taking a chance. That is her choice. If she definitely doesn't want to become pregnant, then she can just not have sex. It's not that hard. Sex comes with a price, and if you're not willing to pay, then don't do it.
many won't have sex until then, those that do commonly get terrible STD's, many marriages will stay together(but some are broken because people are doing extramarital sex), and married couples are usually better able to care for kids than single people. If you are terribly afraid of getting pregnant, to the point of killing someone, you should just not have sex. Abstinance is the only way to be sure of not getting pregnant. It also has the nice effect of rendering you immune to all STD's.So, in conclusion: Many people think mariage is shit, few won't have sex until then, many marriages will disolve, sex is a impulse, abstaining is bad for you, married couples may want kids no more than if they weren't married, and contraceptives can occasionaly fail regardless of how careful the intimates were