Emulator
Moderator: MaxCoderz Staff
- kv83
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Wed 15 Dec, 2004 7:26 pm
- Location: The Hague, Netherlands
- Contact:
I don't see any GUI in the video, except almost the same as with PTIleofox wrote:kv83 wrote:Nice, but atm I don't see any advantage to PTI?That's right! It has GUI!pure win32 code for an efficient gui
Seriously though. What's the use of all them fancy programming tools coming out when fewer and fewer people are actually coding.
- benryves
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Thu 16 Dec, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Croydon, England
- Contact:
Will you provide an interface (such as CoBB's stdio interface) to control it externally?
I ask as I'm thinking of tying an emulator more tightly into Brass/Latenite, and not being able to write back data to the emulator, only read the status, is a bit of a spanner in the works.
I've written my own Z80 core for a SMS/GG emulator and will probably start by tying that in, but frankly don't want to have to write another TI emulator.
I ask as I'm thinking of tying an emulator more tightly into Brass/Latenite, and not being able to write back data to the emulator, only read the status, is a bit of a spanner in the works.
I've written my own Z80 core for a SMS/GG emulator and will probably start by tying that in, but frankly don't want to have to write another TI emulator.
Because tools make things easier, and people would be more likely to pick up asm if it wasn't so freaking hard.leofox wrote:kv83 wrote:Nice, but atm I don't see any advantage to PTI?That's right! It has GUI!pure win32 code for an efficient gui
Seriously though. What's the use of all them fancy programming tools coming out when fewer and fewer people are actually coding.
Sure does, And I do prefer the layout of CoBB's and not the actual calc..Looking good!Jim e wrote:You seem rather defensive.kv83 wrote:I don't see any GUI in the video, except almost the same as with PTI
Can't say its a priority right now, but it is something to think about.Will you provide an interface (such as CoBB's stdio interface) to control it externally?
- benryves
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Thu 16 Dec, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Croydon, England
- Contact:
Sorry, that sounds like a really stupid request from my point; if you're writing your own developent tools why would you want other people to hook into them with their own 'rival' ones?Jim e wrote:Can't say its a priority right now, but it is something to think about.Will you provide an interface (such as CoBB's stdio interface) to control it externally?
Best of luck with the project.
- Jim e
- Calc King
- Posts: 2457
- Joined: Sun 26 Dec, 2004 5:27 am
- Location: SXIOPO = Infinite lives for both players
- Contact:
what questions?kv83 wrote:How about answering my questions
The gui is there and its growing rather quickly.
Yesterday I just got variable importing and sending working, and Spencer plugged it in to drag and drop. He worked it out so you can dnd several files at once currently. So thats working nicely.
- kv83
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 2735
- Joined: Wed 15 Dec, 2004 7:26 pm
- Location: The Hague, Netherlands
- Contact:
The questions was (more or less), what's difference compared to PTI... just wonderin why you guys decided to do this project? (For learning porpuse or something else? Tired of waiting for PTI? ) It's an honest question, don't want to sound rude or anythingJim e wrote:what questions?kv83 wrote:How about answering my questions
The gui is there and its growing rather quickly.
Yesterday I just got variable importing and sending working, and Spencer plugged it in to drag and drop. He worked it out so you can dnd several files at once currently. So thats working nicely.
-
- Calc King
- Posts: 2195
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar, 2005 4:06 am
- Location: sleeping
- Contact:
- Jim e
- Calc King
- Posts: 2457
- Joined: Sun 26 Dec, 2004 5:27 am
- Location: SXIOPO = Infinite lives for both players
- Contact:
Other models. Since the 83+ has everything the lower models have its mostly just copy paste with some mild hack here and there. The 83+SE I just need support link assist, timers, and md5. The 84, is the clock and a mock of a disconnected usb.tr1p1ea wrote:Cool, whats left to do on the emulation side of things?
Emulation side of things should finish up quickly, then theres the other stuff thats really interesting like images, gif, sound and anything that I haven't thought of yet.
I haven't learned win32 code yet so hopefully I can learn something along the way.
PTI probably won't support higher models. For me, I like this stuff. It's hardware, look back at the beginning of the pindur thread and you'll see me being enthusiastic about cracking new things in the 83+(se).( damn that was fun ). Seeing that blinking cursor running perfectly for the first time was just so freaking awesome.The questions was (more or less), what's difference compared to PTI... just wonderin why you guys decided to do this project? (For learning purpose or something else? Tired of waiting for PTI? ) It's an honest question, don't want to sound rude or anything
Spencer wants a debugger.
Tilem in my opinion just isn't for windows. It runs TERRIBLY on my pc. VTI is ancient. And PTI didn't have a release source code. So the only option was to start our own.