xLIB v0.6b Testing

kalan_vod · Post by **kalan_vod** » Sat 21 Jan, 2006 7:13 pm

It has been a while since you have posted here in this thread huh kevin?

or did you ever? Tr1p. have you been sent the example of dys. problem?

necro · Post by **necro** » Sat 21 Jan, 2006 10:46 pm

@tfg: post it so we can try and pick it apart and tell you...know or know not, there is no guess

dysfunction · Post by **dysfunction** » Sun 22 Jan, 2006 1:02 am

Oh sorry, somehow I missed tr1p's request of an example. Alright, try this:

Code: Select all

real(0
real(3,1,0,1
Delvar X
Delvar Y
While 1
getKey->K
X+(K=26)-(K=24)->X
Y+(K=34)-(K=25)->Y
If K/=0
real(1,X,Y,12,63,1,0,0,0,0,1
End

And @Kevin: we've missed you here.

necro · Post by **necro** » Tue 24 Jan, 2006 5:19 am

I don't know why, but the xtemps all seem broken. I went

Code: Select all

"A
real(10,0,11
prgmXTEMP011

and I get no creation of archived program A, I end up with an undifined as xtemp011 doesn't exist. I can't figure out why[/code]

kalan_vod · Post by **kalan_vod** » Tue 24 Jan, 2006 5:24 am

Make sure you are using 0.061b, this problem has been corrected.

DJ_O · Post by **DJ_O** » Tue 24 Jan, 2006 2:38 pm

it seems to work fine I tried CDI's Metroid which uses temp programs and it worked fine

kalan_vod I believe I posted in the xLIB APP thread several months ago

necro · Post by **necro** » Tue 24 Jan, 2006 5:46 pm

It WAS working, but it isn't any more...I'll try resending xlib

Post by **tr1p1ea** » Mon 30 Jan, 2006 9:14 am

The version should now be up the TOP LEFT corner. Also Dysfunction, weird lines show up if you scroll an ld sprite without clearing behind it first, this is normal. I still cant replicate the bug where it only appears when its aligned (scrolled from the left hand side) ... it seems to work fine for me?

dysfunction · Post by **dysfunction** » Mon 30 Jan, 2006 12:46 pm

Ok, I think this was more a problem of my understanding... I didn't realize you had to clear behind it first. I also didn't realize until a week or two ago that the real(0 function had an option to not update the lcd, so it's a non-issue. As for the whole aligned thing, your screenshot seems to have a bit different result than what I see... for me, the direction it's scrolling from, the 8 pixels on that side of the screen don't show up unless the image is aligned.

Post by **tr1p1ea** » Wed 01 Feb, 2006 12:19 pm

I JUST REALISED THAT THE ADDITION OF 16-BIT TILE INDEX'S HAS CAUSED A MASSIVE BOTTLENECK IN THE TILEMAP ROUTINE!!!

I dont know what should be done.

kalan_vod · Post by **kalan_vod** » Wed 01 Feb, 2006 12:58 pm

Could you explain? If it's a problem just take it out?

DJ_O · Post by **DJ_O** » Wed 01 Feb, 2006 1:37 pm

aw i c, but do we really need that many tiles in one map? we cant even fit more than 96 in one screen

256 should be enough. Mauybe go back to 8 bit index?

Post by **tr1p1ea** » Wed 01 Feb, 2006 1:50 pm

I might restrict it so that you can have 10 PIC's ... would that be ok?

dysfunction · Post by **dysfunction** » Wed 01 Feb, 2006 3:30 pm

10 pics altogether... or 10 pics per tilemap? The latter would be more than fine, heck, I was alright with 3 per tilemap.

kalan_vod · Post by **kalan_vod** » Wed 01 Feb, 2006 3:55 pm

dysfunction wrote:10 pics altogether... or 10 pics per tilemap? The latter would be more than fine, heck, I was alright with 3 per tilemap.

Same here.