Wowow... Hold on! Strange computer errors... Nice! (NOT)
Moderator: MaxCoderz Staff
- driesguldolf
- Extreme Poster
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Thu 17 May, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: $4080
- Contact:
Wowow... Hold on! Strange computer errors... Nice! (NOT)
Ok, as the title suggest I'm a bit pissed off about this...
So, I'll start at the begin:
I really like playing around with taskmanager, but not so long ago I found a new tab called "wisselbestandsfouten" (don't know what it is in english maybe KH can help?, literal translation would be "change file errors")
Now some task are really good in putting high numbers there (like +1,000,000! even a system task called svchost.exe...)
Is this dangerous? And if it is what should I do to reduce such errors?
Another thing (though probabely nothing) is, that sometimes some programs take very long to load the interface (when they're in the taskbar and you pop them back) When I quickly press Ctr-Alt-Del to isolate the problem it says 60% of the CPU is in use, now then the program shouldn't be hard to find it doesn't it? No, because the interface of the taskmanager also takes long to load, and when it's ready there's no slowdown anymore... Like it KNEW I opened the taskmanager
Any toughts?
So, I'll start at the begin:
I really like playing around with taskmanager, but not so long ago I found a new tab called "wisselbestandsfouten" (don't know what it is in english maybe KH can help?, literal translation would be "change file errors")
Now some task are really good in putting high numbers there (like +1,000,000! even a system task called svchost.exe...)
Is this dangerous? And if it is what should I do to reduce such errors?
Another thing (though probabely nothing) is, that sometimes some programs take very long to load the interface (when they're in the taskbar and you pop them back) When I quickly press Ctr-Alt-Del to isolate the problem it says 60% of the CPU is in use, now then the program shouldn't be hard to find it doesn't it? No, because the interface of the taskmanager also takes long to load, and when it's ready there's no slowdown anymore... Like it KNEW I opened the taskmanager
Any toughts?
-
- Calc King
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Sat 05 Aug, 2006 7:22 am
- JoostinOnline
- Regular Member
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul, 2007 10:42 pm
- Location: Behind You
- driesguldolf
- Extreme Poster
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Thu 17 May, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: $4080
- Contact:
yeah, thanks KH, I still think it's strange that it even causes errors (not fatal but still, any error of any kind is bad i think). Imo a system task should be an example of proper coding...
About the problem, that's probabely because I don't really like Windows (don't worry I use XP SP2, I'll change to Vista when it works properly, not a second earlier ) and blame it for every friggin thing that goes wrong hehe
About the problem, that's probabely because I don't really like Windows (don't worry I use XP SP2, I'll change to Vista when it works properly, not a second earlier ) and blame it for every friggin thing that goes wrong hehe
- JoostinOnline
- Regular Member
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul, 2007 10:42 pm
- Location: Behind You
-
- Calc King
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Sat 05 Aug, 2006 7:22 am
- benryves
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Thu 16 Dec, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Croydon, England
- Contact:
My translation skills are not very good, but "change file errors" (along with the very high value) almost sounds like "page faults", which are nothing to be concerned about (they are caused by a program attempting to access memory from a page that isn't swapped in - the OS catches this "fault" and swaps in the correct page). By "tab" I assume you mean column in the processes view.
In the past I had problems with a couple of XP updates which temporarily "broke" the BITS service on certain machines resulting in severely degraded performance. Running a System Restore to before the update then temporarily disabling Automatic Updates resolved the issue.
Not really. It's a common place to hide malware, though. XP's task manager doesn't support services very well (remedied in Vista), so I'd use Process Explorer (as recommended) to check and see if there's a problem with one of the services, or if it is a dummy svchost.exe.King Harold wrote:svchost (service host) likes to mess up
In the past I had problems with a couple of XP updates which temporarily "broke" the BITS service on certain machines resulting in severely degraded performance. Running a System Restore to before the update then temporarily disabling Automatic Updates resolved the issue.
- driesguldolf
- Extreme Poster
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Thu 17 May, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: $4080
- Contact:
screenies: One and Two
To avoid confusion: in image 2, the bar marked green contains 'tabs' and the red one contains 'tasks'
Sorry about my not so perfect English
Couldn't get a picture of the cpu usage when it is high...
Please tell me if a questionable task is running
I might want to add that svchost once liked to crash all the time, when ever I got a message that svchost crashed I simple moved the window out if sight (lower right corner ) because if I clicked anything, some stuff stopped working (like sound) and XP changed back to the old look (I mean the XP style -> old win98 style) and after a while followed by even more weird stuff...
As I hoped an update resolved that problem (I hope)...
To avoid confusion: in image 2, the bar marked green contains 'tabs' and the red one contains 'tasks'
Sorry about my not so perfect English
Couldn't get a picture of the cpu usage when it is high...
Please tell me if a questionable task is running
I might want to add that svchost once liked to crash all the time, when ever I got a message that svchost crashed I simple moved the window out if sight (lower right corner ) because if I clicked anything, some stuff stopped working (like sound) and XP changed back to the old look (I mean the XP style -> old win98 style) and after a while followed by even more weird stuff...
As I hoped an update resolved that problem (I hope)...
-
- Calc King
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Sat 05 Aug, 2006 7:22 am
@Ben: Yea I know it's not svchost itself but it is svchost, so...
anyway. I wouldn't be too concerned about wisselbestandfouten, but 1.2 Million of them is enough to make me worried. Is your computer "ratteling" at that moment? Have you forgotten to disable the indexing service? (it shouldn't cause trouble, but it eats resources that you might like to keep)
Do you use a weird patched uxtheme.dll? If not: patch it, if you do: unpatch it, if the problem (with the style) still exists.. panic and blame microsoft?
Or maybe someone else here knows more about it?
anyway. I wouldn't be too concerned about wisselbestandfouten, but 1.2 Million of them is enough to make me worried. Is your computer "ratteling" at that moment? Have you forgotten to disable the indexing service? (it shouldn't cause trouble, but it eats resources that you might like to keep)
Do you use a weird patched uxtheme.dll? If not: patch it, if you do: unpatch it, if the problem (with the style) still exists.. panic and blame microsoft?
Or maybe someone else here knows more about it?
Just means windows put some stuff for the program from ram onto the pagefile on the harddive and had to load it from there agian because the program asked for it.
It's slower than loading for ram but ram is more limited obviously.
When a process hangs for some time windows is probably very bussy swapping all that data back from the pagefile into ram so the program can continue.
It's slower than loading for ram but ram is more limited obviously.
When a process hangs for some time windows is probably very bussy swapping all that data back from the pagefile into ram so the program can continue.
- benryves
- Maxcoderz Staff
- Posts: 3087
- Joined: Thu 16 Dec, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Croydon, England
- Contact:
How about 21 million? It really is nothing to be concerned about.King Harold wrote:anyway. I wouldn't be too concerned about wisselbestandfouten, but 1.2 Million of them is enough to make me worried.
Out of interest, which application causes the most problems when restoring windows (it wouldn't be Firefox by any chance, would it?)
Try defragmenting your hard disk drive. PageDefrag might also help.
- driesguldolf
- Extreme Poster
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Thu 17 May, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: $4080
- Contact:
- driesguldolf
- Extreme Poster
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Thu 17 May, 2007 4:49 pm
- Location: $4080
- Contact: