DirectX timebombexception

King Harold · Post by **King Harold** » Wed 13 Dec, 2006 8:35 pm

They could refuse to answer them, now(=2 months ago) lots of people will mail about how to port their code

Post by **kv83** » Thu 14 Dec, 2006 9:27 am

Which is not a bad thing, since they support the new library. As more people go using it, the better they can make it. It's really not that complicated to understand.

Post by **benryves** » Thu 14 Dec, 2006 10:25 am

King Harold wrote:They could refuse to answer them, now(=2 months ago) lots of people will mail about how to port their code

Why would people write large volumes of code against a beta library?

King Harold · Post by **King Harold** » Thu 14 Dec, 2006 3:55 pm

Well, not large, but anything written will have to be changed

Post by **benryves** » Thu 14 Dec, 2006 3:58 pm

King Harold wrote:Well, not large, but anything written will have to be changed

That would have been anticipated anyway.

Had in been a release candidate, that's different, but things in beta are subject to change.

King Harold · Post by **King Harold** » Thu 14 Dec, 2006 4:30 pm

that's probebly what teh licence said, "subject to change", but I still think they should just have discontinued it without killing it.